Benchmark set based on CATH 3.2.0 SCOP 1.73

The benchmark set contains the consistently defined and classified domain pairs in CATH 3.2.0 and SCOP 1.73 (the green and red cells in those tables). The domains used are filtered so that the maximal sequence identity between any domain pair is below 50%.

• similar pairs (same SCOP fold and same CATH topology, green cells in the tables): 129436 domain pairs
• non-similar pairs (different folds in SCOP and different topologies in CATH, red cells in the tables): 1740476 domain pairs

The clusters of domains with minimum 50% sequence identity can be downloaded here. The file determines for each representative domain used in the benchmark set the domains that share at least 50% sequence identity with the representant domain (if any). The file allows to add additional domains to or to exchange domain in the benchmark set (with respect to the mapping). The full mapping can be downloaded here: here. The pairwise similarities (if sequence identity > 0.4) between the domains in mappable subsets of CATH superfamilies can be downloaded here.

Basic information on the SCOP (1.73) and CATH (3.2.0) datasets

The following two tables display information about the most current database versions of SCOP and CATH. In particular they display their protein and domain content, their number of families, superfamilies, folds and classes (homologous superfamilies, topologies, architectures and classes respectively). The second table displays the content of the two hierarchies after mapping the domain definitions as described in the paper with a minimal overlap of 0.8.

Data on the content of the most current SCOP and CATH version

	CATH 3.2.0 (July 2008)	SCOP 1.73 (November 2007)
class	4	11	class
arch	40	--	--
topology	1110	1283	fold
superfamily	2178	2034	superfamily
--	--	3751	family
domains	114215	97178	domains
pdbs	36015	34495	pdbs
pdbs in both	29042		pdbs in both

Data content after mapping domains (overlap > 0.8)

	CATH 3.1.0 (January 2008)	SCOP 1.73 (November 2007)
class	4	11	class
arch	38	--	--
topology	762	769	fold
superfamily	1502	1302	superfamily
--	--	2342	family
domains	64016		domains
pdbs	24068		pdbs

Detailed information on the mapping of SCOP and CATH (both directions)

Mapping of SCOP 1.73 => CATH 3.2.0 classified sets

The following two tables display the mapping of inner nodes from SCOP onto CATH nodes via the mapping method discussed in the paper. Only the best node from CATH according to the F-measure is mapped onto the query node in SCOP. The first table displays all mappable nodes, i.e. all nodes which have a F-measure > 0.0. In the second table we require a higher quality for a mapping, i.e. a F-measure > 0.8. While the mapped nodes now fit very well and their domain sets have a large "overlap", many nodes do not find a mapping partner in CATH which fulfils the quality criterion.

F ≥ 0	unmappable	root	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
class	0	0	4	2	1	4
fold	0	0	0	6	517	246
superfamily	0	0	0	2	28	1272
family	0	0	0	1	98	2333

F ≥ 0.8	unmappable	root	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
class	8	0	2	0	0	1
fold	134	0	0	4	447	184
superfamily	242	0	0	2	22	1036
family	1140	0	0	1	5	1196

Mapping of CATH => SCOP

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from CATH via SCOP. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. 474.399 pairs (2.604%) two domains from the same CATH superfamily are classified to be in different folds of the same class in SCOP.
The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. E.g. we find that the 474.399 pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 69 fold and 91 superfamilies in SCOP (29 topologies in and 35 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from our mapping between SCOP and CATH.

	outer class	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
outer class	1.244.997.435 96.708%	294.293.919 55.243%	41.985.084 28.427%	547.551 0.923%	23.066 0.105%
class	42.139.449 3.273%	237.694.724 44.619%	105.087.411 71.151%	44.758.134 75.479%	674.344 3.079%
fold	195.536 0.015%	451.073 0.085%	463.942 0.314%	13.285.419 22.404%	1.931.247 8.819%
supfam	40.996 0.003%	198.321 0.037%	150.476 0.102%	651.521 1.099%	9.820.267 44.844%
family	2.779 0.000%	84.686 0.016%	8.400 0.006%	56.453 0.095%	9.449.887 43.153%
sum	1.287.376.128 62.830%	532.722.720 25.999%	147.695.312 7.208%	59.299.080 2.894%	21.898.812 1.069%

outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	769/1302 762/1502	733/1244 703/1436	748/1233 734/1447	180/452 49/529	67/87 44/58
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	769/1302 762/1502	729/1237 698/1428	732/1202 720/1407	246/579 58/634	71/92 30/36
fold (SCOP) fold (CATH)	23/162 89/185	41/252 110/324	53/315 137/369	88/498 71/546	34/125 31/45
supfam (SCOP) supfam (CATH)	21/22 71/89	40/43 104/150	43/45 110/139	63/91 56/252	199/273 174/269
family (SCOP) family (CATH)	18/18 63/76	25/26 57/78	24/24 62/78	32/56 26/119	769/1302 762/1502

Mapping of SCOP => CATH

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from SCOP via CATH. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. for 70.188 pairs (0.866%%) two domains from the same SCOP family are classified to be in different folds of the same class in CATH. The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. Therefore, we find that the pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 25 fold and 26 superfamilies in SCOP (54 topologies in and 77 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from the mapping.

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class	1.244.997.435 78.705%	42.139.449 9.792%	195.536 1.198%	40.996 0.377%	2.779 0.029%
class	294.293.919 18.604%	237.694.724 55.232%	451.073 2.763%	198.321 1.826%	84.686 0.882%
arch	41.985.084 2.654%	105.087.411 24.419%	463.942 2.842%	150.476 1.385%	8.400 0.087%
top	547.551 0.035%	44.758.134 10.400%	13.285.419 81.370%	651.521 5.998%	56.453 0.588%
hom	23.066 0.001%	674.344 0.157%	1.931.247 11.828%	9.820.267 90.413%	9.449.887 98.414%
sum	1.581.846.912 77.201%	430.354.080 21.003%	16.327.217 0.797%	10.861.581 0.530%	9.602.205 0.469%

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	38/762 1302/2342	38/762 1302/2342	19/89 162/293	16/71 22/100	13/63 18/21
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	37/703 1244/2281	37/698 1237/2273	19/110 252/430	18/104 43/192	13/57 26/28
arch (SCOP) arch (CATH)	18/734 1233/2226	22/720 1202/2187	19/137 315/573	13/110 45/210	12/62 24/26
top (SCOP) top (CATH)	13/49 452/793	12/58 579/1126	23/71 498/915	18/56 91/504	11/26 56/63
hom (SCOP) hom (CATH)	13/44 87/158	13/30 92/223	18/31 125/291	26/174 273/1101	38/762 1302/2342

The benchmark set contains the consistently defined and classified domain pairs in CATH 3.1.0 and SCOP 1.73 (the green and red cells in those tables). The domains used are filtered so that the maximal sequence identity between any domain pair is below 50%. The benchmark set contains domains from 2043 (out of 3751) SCOP families, 1139 (out of 2034) SCOP superfamilies and 672 (out of 1283) SCOP folds.

• similar pairs (same SCOP fold and same CATH topology, green cells in the tables): 129436 domain pairs
• non-similar pairs (different folds in SCOP and different topologies in CATH, red cells in the tables): 1740476 domain pairs

The clusters of domains with minimum 50% sequence identity can be downloaded here. The file determines for each representative domain used in the benchmark set the domains that share at least 50% sequence identity with the representant domain (if any). The file allows to add additional domains to or to exchange domain in the benchmark set (with respect to the mapping). The full mapping can be downloaded here: here. The pairwise similarities (if sequence identity > 0.4) between the domains in mappable subsets of CATH superfamilies can be downloaded here. (Similarities > 0.95 are on-line clustered i.e. if for a given domain d1 a domain d2 with sequence identity > 0.95 is detected, d2 is excluded from the further process and put to the same cluster as d1. Mappings

Mapping of SCOP => CATH classified sets

The following two tables display the mapping of inner nodes from SCOP onto CATH nodes via the mapping method discussed in the paper. Only the best node from CATH according to the F-measure is mapped onto the query node in SCOP. The first table displays all mappable nodes, i.e. all nodes which have a F-measure > 0.0. In the second table we require a higher quality for a mapping, i.e. a F-measure > 0.8. While the mapped nodes now fit very well and their domain sets have a large "overlap", many nodes do not find a mapping partner in CATH which fulfils the quality criterion.

F ≥ 0	unmappable	root	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
class	0	0	4	2	1	4
fold	0	0	0	5	504	236
superfamily	0	0	0	2	32	1224
family	0	0	0	1	9	2218

F ≥ 0.8	unmappable	root	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
class	8	0	2	0	0	1
fold	125	0	0	4	439	177
superfamily	236	0	0	1	24	997
family	1055	0	0	1	6	1166

Mapping of CATH => SCOP

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from CATH via SCOP. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. 474.399 pairs (2.604%) two domains from the same CATH superfamily are classified to be in different folds of the same class in SCOP.
The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. E.g. we find that the 474.399 pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 69 fold and 91 superfamilies in SCOP (29 topologies in and 35 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from our mapping between SCOP and CATH.

	outer class	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
outer class	962.011.672 97.198%	220.082.756 54.096%	29.352.140 26.111%	444.171 0.953%	18.286 0.100%
class	27.559.663 2.785%	186.177.961 45.762%	82.570.027 73.451%	34.815.630 74.729%	474.399 2.604%
fold	131.175 0.013%	338.810 0.083%	371.882 0.331%	10.879.564 23.352%	1.547.324 8.493%
supfam	35.834 0.004%	167.921 0.041%	113.038 0.101%	396.388 0.851%	8.208.965 45.056%
family	2.326 0.000%	70.188 0.017%	7.316 0.007%	53.505 0.115%	7.970.415 43.747%
sum	989.740.672 62.889%	406.837.664 25.851%	112.414.400 7.143%	46.589.260 2.9100%	18.219.388 1.158%

	outer class	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	711/1202 682/1402	724/1189 708/1407	174/432 48/512	60/79 42/54
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	706/1194 676/1393	698/1148 693/1357	238/558 57/618	69/91 29/35
fold (SCOP) fold (CATH)	23/159 88/180	39/263 107/331	52/286 132/346	86/481 71/532	32/118 29/42
supfam (SCOP) supfam (CATH)	21/22 70/87	39/42 101/150	41/43 106/138	65/91 57/253	188/253 165/250
family (SCOP) family (CATH)	14/14 53/62	25/26 54/77	20/21 55/71	36/60 28/130	745/1258 736/1462

Mapping of SCOP => CATH

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from SCOP via CATH. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. for 70.188 pairs (0.866%%) two domains from the same SCOP family are classified to be in different folds of the same class in CATH. The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. Therefore, we find that the pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 25 fold and 26 superfamilies in SCOP (54 topologies in and 77 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from the mapping.

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class	962.011.672 79.380%	27.559.663 8.311%	131.175 0.989%	35.834 0.402%	2.326 0.029%
class	220.082.756 18.1100%	186.177.961 56.146%	338.810 2.553%	167.921 1.882%	70.188 0.866%
arch	29.352.140 2.422%	82.570.027 24.901%	371.882 2.803%	113.038 1.267%	7.316 0.090%
top	444.171 0.037%	34.815.630 10.499%	10.879.564 81.994%	396.388 4.443%	53.505 0.6100%
hom	18.286 0.002%	474.399 0.143%	1.547.324 11.661%	8.208.965 92.007%	7.970.415 98.355%
sum	1.211.908.992 77.005%	331.597.664 21.070%	13.268.755 0.843%	8.922.146 0.567%	8.103.750 0.515%

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	745/1258 736/1462	23/159 88/180	21/22 70/87	14/14 53/62
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	711/1202 682/1402	706/1194 676/1393	39/263 107/331	39/42 101/150	25/26 54/77
arch (SCOP) arch (CATH)	724/1189 708/1407	698/1148 693/1357	52/286 132/346	41/43 106/138	20/21 55/71
top (SCOP) top (CATH)	174/432 48/512	238/558 57/618	86/481 71/532	65/91 57/253	36/60 28/130
hom (SCOP) hom (CATH)	60/79 42/54	69/91 29/35	32/118 29/42	188/253 165/250	745/1258 736/1462

In order to allow for an interactive use of the mapping of SCOP and CATH computed we have implemented an interactive browser. You can choose any SCOP or CATH node as entry point and explore the relationships between SCOP and CATH in detail by clicking on a node (a SCOP or CATH set) in the displayed graphs to display its respective mapping in the other classification (CATH or SCOP, respectively).

SCOP_version	1.551.571.591.611.631.651.671.691.711.73
CATH_version	2.42.52.5.12.6.03.0.03.1.03.2.0
Minimal F-measure
Entry node in SCOP or CATH

Passwort:

Passwort bestätigen:

The following two tables display information about the most current database versions of SCOP and CATH. In particular they display their protein and domain content, their number of families, superfamilies, folds and classes (homologous superfamilies, topologies, architectures and classes respectively). The second table displays the content of the two hierarchies after mapping the domain definitions as described in the paper with a minimal overlap of 0.8.

Data on the content of the most current SCOP and CATH version

	CATH 3.1.0 (January 2007)	SCOP 1.73 (November 2007)
class	4	11	class
arch	40	--	--
topology	1084	1283	fold
superfamily	2091	2034	superfamily
--	--	3751	family
domains	93851	97178	domains
pdbs	30028	34495	pdbs
pdbs in both	27553		pdbs in both

Data content after mapping domains (overlap > 0.8)

	CATH 3.1.0 (January 2007)	SCOP 1.73 (November 2007)
class	4	11	class
arch	38	--	--
topology	736	754	fold
superfamily	1462	1258	superfamily
--	--	2228	family
domains	56104		domains
pdbs	19266		pdbs

Mapping of SCOP => CATH classified sets

The following two tables display the mapping of inner nodes from SCOP onto CATH nodes via the mapping method discussed in the paper. Only the best node from CATH according to the F-measure is mapped onto the query node in SCOP. The first table displays all mappable nodes, i.e. all nodes which have a F-measure > 0.0. In the second table we require a higher quality for a mapping, i.e. a F-measure > 0.8. While the mapped nodes now fit very well and their domain sets have a large "overlap", many nodes do not find a mapping partner in CATH which fulfils the quality criterion.

Mapping of CATH => SCOP

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from CATH via SCOP. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. 474.399 pairs (2.604%) two domains from the same CATH superfamily are classified to be in different folds of the same class in SCOP.
The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. E.g. we find that the 474.399 pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 69 fold and 91 superfamilies in SCOP (29 topologies in and 35 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from our mapping between SCOP and CATH.

	outer class	class	architecture	topology	superfamily
outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	711/1202 682/1402	724/1189 708/1407	174/432 48/512	60/79 42/54
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	706/1194 676/1393	698/1148 693/1357	238/558 57/618	69/91 29/35
fold (SCOP) fold (CATH)	23/159 88/180	39/263 107/331	52/286 132/346	86/481 71/532	32/118 29/42
supfam (SCOP) supfam (CATH)	21/22 70/87	39/42 101/150	41/43 106/138	65/91 57/253	188/253 165/250
family (SCOP) family (CATH)	14/14 53/62	25/26 54/77	20/21 55/71	36/60 28/130	745/1258 736/1462

Mapping of SCOP => CATH

Those two tables display detailed data on the consistency checks of domain pairs from SCOP via CATH. The first table displays the cases (number of pairs and percentages summing up to 100% per column) being observed in the consistency checks. E.g. for 70.188 pairs (0.866%%) two domains from the same SCOP family are classified to be in different folds of the same class in CATH. The second table displays the same type of information but this time shows how many distinct folds and superfamilies from SCOP and topologies / superfamiles from CATH account for the cases observed. Therefore, we find that the pairs accounting for the example described above origin from 25 fold and 26 superfamilies in SCOP (54 topologies in and 77 superfamilies in CATH respectively).

Green (positive pairs) and Red (negative pairs) cells in the tables correspond to the pairs of domains selected for the benchmark sets extracted from the mapping.

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class	962.011.672 79.380%	27.559.663 8.311%	131.175 0.989%	35.834 0.402%	2.326 0.029%
class	220.082.756 18.1100%	186.177.961 56.146%	338.810 2.553%	167.921 1.882%	70.188 0.866%
arch	29.352.140 2.422%	82.570.027 24.901%	371.882 2.803%	113.038 1.267%	7.316 0.090%
top	444.171 0.037%	34.815.630 10.499%	10.879.564 81.994%	396.388 4.443%	53.505 0.6100%
hom	18.286 0.002%	474.399 0.143%	1.547.324 11.661%	8.208.965 92.007%	7.970.415 98.355%
sum	1.211.908.992 77.005%	331.597.664 21.070%	13.268.755 0.843%	8.922.146 0.567%	8.103.750 0.515%

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class (SCOP) outer class (CATH)	745/1258 736/1462	745/1258 736/1462	23/159 88/180	21/22 70/87	14/14 53/62
class (SCOP) class (CATH)	711/1202 682/1402	706/1194 676/1393	39/263 107/331	39/42 101/150	25/26 54/77
arch (SCOP) arch (CATH)	724/1189 708/1407	698/1148 693/1357	52/286 132/346	41/43 106/138	20/21 55/71
top (SCOP) top (CATH)	174/432 48/512	238/558 57/618	86/481 71/532	65/91 57/253	36/60 28/130
hom (SCOP) hom (CATH)	60/79 42/54	69/91 29/35	32/118 29/42	188/253 165/250	745/1258 736/1462

In the table below we show all pairs of domains calculated on the mappable subset of all CATH domains sharing less than 50% sequence identity, which are inconsistently defined in SCOP and CATH. Only pairs where both SCOP domains belong to the classes 'a'-'d' are shown. The rows correspond to CATH levels, the columns to levels of the SCOP hierarchy. Clicking e.g. on the class row and the family column shows all pairs of domains which are classified to be in the same family in SCOP but to be in different classes in CATH.

	outer class	class	fold	superfamily	family
outer class			523 pairs	297 pairs	11 pairs
class			2647 pairs	764 pairs	114 pairs
arch				1863 pairs	92 pairs
top	2908 pairs	294631 pairs		3190 pairs	332 pairs
hom	70 pairs	2462 pairs	9873 pairs

Here we display the subgraphs of similar folds in SCOP which have been identified by a consistency check in CATH as described in the paper. We show the SCOP fold identifiers as well as the number of connections / links per fold in brackets. Click on the image link to view the fold graph in detail.

• image c.120 (37) c.60 (37) c.26 (37) c.108 (37) c.25 (37) c.15 (37) c.33 (37) c.91 (37) c.41 (37) c.48 (37) c.69 (37) c.34 (37) c.36 (37) c.30 (37) c.2 (37) c.78 (37) c.17 (37) c.4 (37) c.31 (37) c.56 (38) c.32 (37) c.44 (37) c.129 (37) c.66 (37) c.23 (37) c.5 (37) d.108 (1) c.72 (37) c.52 (37) c.80 (37) c.125 (37) c.24 (37) c.16 (37) c.62 (37) c.51 (37) c.61 (37) c.65 (37) c.37 (37) c.124 (37)
• image b.3 (8) b.94 (9) b.71 (8) d.273 (9) b.19 (9) b.82 (17) b.2 (8) b.115 (9) b.15 (8) b.121 (9) b.16 (8) b.22 (9) b.1 (8) b.6 (8) b.29 (9) b.7 (8) b.18 (9) b.23 (9)
• image b.34 (7) d.12 (2) b.136 (3) d.58 (2) d.17 (2) d.1 (2) d.9 (4) b.38 (3) i.1 (6) b.40 (4) b.84 (4) g.41 (5)
• image h.3 (8) f.14 (8) f.28 (8) a.214 (8) a.30 (8) a.16 (8) a.2 (8) f.17 (8) a.32 (8)
• image a.56 (3) a.4 (5) a.51 (2) d.52 (3) d.227 (3) a.61 (3) d.130 (3) j.84 (2) a.60 (6)
• image a.238 (1) a.8 (6) f.23 (3) f.3 (3) h.1 (3) a.156 (2) a.5 (2)
• image a.118 (2) d.110 (1) i.23 (2) d.211 (1)
• image d.67 (2) d.74 (2) d.185 (2)
• image d.230 (2) d.240 (1) d.68 (1)
• image g.3 (2) g.69 (2) g.68 (2)
• image b.49 (2) b.43 (2) b.44 (2)
• image a.1 (1) f.1 (1)
• image d.78 (1) a.143 (1)
• image a.19 (1) a.69 (1)
• image a.47 (1) a.7 (1)
• image a.6 (1) d.201 (1)
• image b.107 (1) b.4 (1)
• image b.122 (1) b.53 (1)
• image b.60 (1) b.61 (1)
• image c.1 (1) c.6 (1)
• image c.59 (1) c.45 (1)
• image d.81 (1) c.47 (1)
• image d.129 (1) d.105 (1)
• image k.45 (1) d.15 (1)
• image d.55 (1) d.150 (1)
• image g.37 (1) d.50 (1)
• image d.87 (1) d.54 (1)
• image g.27 (1) g.18 (1)
• image g.50 (1) g.44 (1)

Here we display the subgraphs of similar topologies in CATH which have been identified by a consistency check in SCOP as described in the paper. We show the CATH topology ids as well as the number of connections / links per fold in brackets. Click on the image link to view the topology graph in detail.

• image 2.70.70 (1) 2.20.25 (4) 3.90.80 (2) 2.40.200 (2) 3.30.1060 (3) 2.40.50 (5) 3.40.462 (3) 2.30.30 (5) 2.60.11 (4) 3.30.70 (5) 3.10.450 (4) 3.40.1120 (1) 2.20.28 (4) 3.90.320 (3)
• image 3.40.580 (6) 3.40.1190 (1) 3.40.810 (2) 3.40.1350 (6) 3.90.950 (1) 3.40.850 (1) 3.40.1340 (6) 3.40.630 (1) 3.40.50 (12) 3.40.91 (6) 3.40.210 (6) 3.40.600 (6) 3.40.1080 (2)
• image 2.60.130 (1) 2.60.40 (4) 2.70.9 (4) 3.60.130 (2) 2.170.30 (4) 2.70.50 (1) 2.70.100 (1) 2.60.169 (4) 3.90.209 (1) 2.60.120 (8) 2.60.175 (4)
• image 4.10.95 (7) 4.10.220 (1) 1.10.8 (2) 1.10.442 (7) 4.10.49 (7) 1.20.1270 (2) 1.20.5 (10) 4.10.93 (7) 4.10.51 (7) 4.10.81 (7) 4.10.91 (7)
• image 4.10.640 (5) 1.10.10 (5) 1.10.1270 (5) 1.10.1680 (5) 1.10.1750 (5) 1.10.150 (6) 3.30.300 (1)
• image 3.90.1410 (6) 2.10.150 (6) 3.90.1210 (6) 2.40.340 (6) 2.40.300 (6) 2.70.40 (6) 2.170.270 (6)
• image 2.10.69 (4) 2.10.22 (4) 2.10.25 (4) 3.30.30 (4) 3.30.60 (4)
• image 1.25.40 (3) 1.25.10 (4) 1.10.2080 (3) 1.20.190 (3) 3.30.450 (1)
• image 3.40.367 (3) 2.30.37 (3) 3.40.350 (3) 3.30.420 (3)
• image 2.40.10 (3) 3.20.14 (2) 2.40.30 (3) 2.40.37 (2)
• image 3.30.1660 (2) 3.30.1490 (2) 3.30.110 (3) 3.65.10 (1)
• image 3.30.310 (3) 3.90.380 (3) 3.30.1400 (3) 3.30.530 (3)
• image 3.90.176 (3) 3.90.228 (3) 3.90.210 (3) 3.90.175 (3)
• image 1.10.490 (2) 1.10.1060 (1) 1.10.437 (1)
• image 4.10.160 (2) 4.10.260 (2) 1.10.1620 (2)
• image 3.90.20 (1) 1.10.287 (2) 1.20.20 (1)
• image 2.40.240 (2) 2.30.130 (2) 3.10.400 (2)
• image 3.30.50 (2) 4.10.830 (2) 2.30.170 (2)
• image 2.40.170 (2) 2.40.230 (2) 2.40.160 (2)
• image 3.90.1580 (2) 3.10.40 (2) 3.10.100 (2)
• image 3.30.379 (2) 3.90.1240 (2) 3.40.390 (2)
• image 3.90.540 (2) 3.40.570 (2) 3.90.75 (2)
• image 1.10.120 (1) 1.10.110 (1)
• image 1.10.1130 (1) 3.90.10 (1)
• image 1.10.1140 (1) 1.20.150 (1)
• image 1.10.1220 (1) 1.10.140 (1)
• image 1.10.3210 (1) 1.10.1300 (1)
• image 1.10.1480 (1) 3.90.940 (1)
• image 1.10.1660 (1) 3.30.56 (1)
• image 3.30.240 (1) 1.10.260 (1)
• image 1.10.3130 (1) 2.160.10 (1)
• image 1.10.510 (1) 3.30.200 (1)
• image 1.20.144 (1) 1.10.606 (1)
• image 1.20.1260 (1) 1.10.620 (1)
• image 1.20.950 (1) 1.20.1300 (1)
• image 1.20.140 (1) 1.20.920 (1)
• image 1.50.10 (1) 1.50.30 (1)
• image 2.40.20 (1) 2.10.10 (1)
• image 2.150.10 (1) 2.160.20 (1)
• image 3.90.1590 (1) 2.170.150 (1)
• image 2.20.20 (1) 3.10.360 (1)
• image 2.30.33 (1) 3.90.180 (1)
• image 2.40.310 (1) 2.40.128 (1)
• image 3.30.500 (1) 3.10.320 (1)
• image 3.20.110 (1) 3.20.20 (1)
• image 3.30.479 (1) 3.30.1130 (1)
• image 3.30.1360 (1) 3.30.830 (1)
• image 3.30.1700 (1) 3.30.230 (1)
• image 3.30.360 (1) 3.40.30 (1)
• image 3.50.30 (1) 3.50.7 (1)
• image 3.60.60 (1) 3.60.20 (1)
• image 3.90.70 (1) 3.90.260 (1)